Branching and Version Control: Difference between revisions

From LuxCoreRender Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
* However, we want to be able to welcome occasional contributors.
* However, we want to be able to welcome occasional contributors.
* Our needs vary depending on whether we are in feature development phases or release and stabilization phases.
* Our needs vary depending on whether we are in feature development phases or release and stabilization phases.
* We deploy on PyPi, so version history is not rewritable





Revision as of 11:06, 30 August 2026

The purpose of this document is to define the rules for branching strategy for LuxCoreRender repositories.

Status: PROPOSAL

Preliminary considerations

A few considerations should be kept in mind:

  • We are a very small core team.
  • However, we want to be able to welcome occasional contributors.
  • Our needs vary depending on whether we are in feature development phases or release and stabilization phases.
  • We deploy on PyPi, so version history is not rewritable


Workflow

We rely on a main branch, always stable, always releasable.

main ─────●────●─────────●────●────●──→ (always stable, always releasable)

           \                   \
            feature/big-thing   feature/another-thing
             (lives for weeks,    (short, merges fast)
              synced regularly)


Rules of thumb:

  • main is always deployable/stable:
    • Never push straight to it.
    • Never rewrite history
  • Releases are represented by tags on the `main` branch
  • Every piece of work gets a short-lived branch: feature/login-form, fix/cart-bug, chore/upgrade-deps.
  • Keep branches alive for hours to a couple days, not weeks. Long-lived branches are where merge conflicts and "it works on my branch" problems come from.
  • Delete branches after merge to keep things tidy.